Arizona Public Services ground breaking rooftop solar program could become the 21st century business model utilities have been looking for if it gets past state regulators.
APS, Arizonas dominant electric utility, wants to fund, install, own, and maintain 3,000 rooftop solar systems. The utility proposes to reimburse each customer who hosts part of the cumulative 20 megawatts of solar with a monthly $30 bill credit for the entire 20 year program.
The bill credit is a lease payment for rooftop real estate, explained APS Renewables Manager Marc Romito. The roofs will be pre-screened by APS but, as with the third party ownership (TPO) lease contracts offered by private sector companies like SolarCity, Clean Power Finance, and SunPower, the hosts will pay no upfront fees and have no ownership responsibilities.
APS determined $30 to be the value of the roof space through a study of other U.S. utility programs and consultations with local solar installers. That is significantly higher than Arizonas average $5 to $10 per month savings from a solar lease deal, according to TPO market leader SolarCitys VP Jonathan Bass.
Rate-basing rooftop solar
They dont have to think about whether they can do something profitably. It will be profitable because they can rate-base it, SolarCity's Bass argued. If there were ever a reason for a regulatory body to exist it would be to stop a state-sponsored monopoly from unfairly competing against the free market in an entirely new industry.
APS is "not trying to compete with [the third-party ownership] model, Romito countered. Customers will still have lease and cash purchase options. This is for an entirely new class and category of customers that have no way to access a lease or cash purchase.
APS developed the solar business model by listening to its customers, Romito said. They like the idea of their utility participating in rooftop solar.
APS began hearing that message in protests by pro-solar utility customers during last falls passionate fight over Arizonas net metering policy. In that case, the TPO leasing companies and APS fought bitterly over the utilitys proposed $8 per kilowatt bill charge on net metered solar owners. The Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) disappointed APS by reducing the bill charge to $0.70 per kilowatt.
Through its AZ Sun Program, APS has built hundreds of megawatts of utility scale and commercial-industrial scale projects. It has almost fulfilled its commitment to the ACC to build more solar than is required by the states 15% by 2025 renewables mandate. This year, it will invest $50 million to $70 million more, either for the rooftop program or a less costly 20 megawatt community solar array.
Another 20 megawatts of solar is going on the system, Romito said. This creates an opportunity to expand rooftop solar in our service territory.
The program avoids any tie in with a net metered rate or rate design, Romito said. Though its renewable energy credits will help APS meet the renewables mandate, it also helps satisfy the mandates 30% distributed generation requirement. We are interconnecting these systems on our side of the meter. There is no net metering involved. We are tying the production directly into the APS distribution system.
If it wins ACC approval in an open regulatory proceeding expected later this year, APS wants to complete development by the end of 2015. It would partner with qualified local solar installers selected through an open bidding process. And it would set installation standards and specify the most reliable solar modules and the most advanced inverters, Romito said.
The legal question
Solar leasing companies like SolarCity think the APS program may be illegal.
But unlike solar leasing companies, Romito said, we have been here for over 100 years. We are held accountable by a regulatory body and we are accountable to our customers. We are putting this project into our regulated portfolio.
That is why, Bass said, the ACC should not approve the proposal. Rate-basing allows them to get paid for their cost and get a guaranteed return. That is a totally unlevel playing field. It takes away the incentive to keep costs down and would reverse a lot of the progress made by the free market in lowering solar costs.
It is illegal, added Rose Law Group Sr. Partner Court Rich, who specializes in energy policy law. It saddles all ratepayers with the tab for APSs investment and profit on each solar system for decades. If the ACC approves the proposal, Rich added, regulators could find themselves settling landlord tenant type disputes between thousands of customers and the utility.
The commission last year considered and rejected a proposal to deregulate APS but I dont think they contemplated the idea of expanding the monopoly, Rich said.
There is absolutely no legal issue, Romito said. Rate-basing assets is routine business for us. The fixed rate of return is how we recover costs if we demonstrate we are serving our customers. Rate-basing has been legally vetted in the commission process, he added. It exists because the regulated utility gives you reliability and quality.
The program is not in direct competition with solar leasing companies, he added. It is another option and creates more rooftop solar, in partnership with any solar company that bids to participate.
View all SMART GRID Bulletins click here
Enter your email-id to subscribe to theSMARTGRID Bulletins